Thursday, May 8, 2014

John York concerts

Barry McGuire & John York
Trippin’ The Sixties
Friday, May 9, 2014, 8pm $20
ALVAS SHOWROOM
1417 W. 8th St. San Pedro, CA 90732
800-403-3447

Barry McGuire & John York
Trippin, The Sixties
THE FRET HOUSE
Saturday, May 10, 2014, 8pm, $20
309 N. Citrus Ave. Covina, CA 91732
626-339-7020

Barry McGuire & John York
Trippin’ The Sixties
Sunday, May 11, 2014, 2pm. $20
 Coffee Gallery Back Stage
2029 N. Lake Ave. Altadena, CA 91001
Reservations: 626-7986236, www.coffeegallery.com

Friday, May 2, 2014

The Byrds’ First Four Albums Remastered on CD in 1996: A Re-Assessment and Analysis of Remixed Tracks - EPILOGUE AND APPENDIXES by MARK TEEHAN



Epilogue

Undeniably, the release of the Byrds’ first four albums on CD in April 1996 set a new, higher standard for reissues of 60’s artists on disc for the following reasons: their state-of-the art sound quality; the generally judicious choices made on the remixing and mastering of tracks; the inclusion of top-flight and often rare bonus tracks; and the superb and informative liner notes (by David Fricke) and song notes (by Johnny Rogan). The entire project exuded class and excellent attention to detail. Clearly, a considerable amount of work, research, and preparation went into it.

Thus it was all the more puzzling why neither Project Director Adam Block nor especially Producer Bob Irwin saw fit to include annotations regarding which tracks on each album had been remixed, and from what type of multi-track masters. One would have thought that would have been a relatively straightforward matter to cover. While casual fans may not have cared, Block and Irwin had to have known that die-hard Byrds’ fans would, and surely deserved that information. Ironically, even the much-maligned 1990 box set had managed to include such historically useful notes, making it crystal-clear which tracks had been remixed and from what source tapes. This unexplained omission has marred the otherwise fine Legacy CD reissue series of the Byrds’ catalog over the years, and led to understandable speculation and debate- notably in the past decade in online forums.


On a more minor note, it was rather surprising that apparently none of the surviving Byrds were asked for their feedback on the remixed tracks prior to the release of these Legacy reissue CD’s. After all, Roger McGuinn had served as a musical consultant on the 1990 box set, reviewing “… hours of previously unreleased material…” and assisting in the creation of new stereo mixes of some songs that had only been in mono (1990 box set, liner notes, 13). David Crosby seemed especially upset that the Legacy reissue team failed to solicit his opinions ahead of time: “… The only thing that pisses me is that they never asked anything. They never talked to me not once, they went ahead and did it and just did it….” (http://www.analogplanet.com/content/david-crosby-can-remember-his-name-and-great-deal-more-part-ii-0).

It is this writer’s hope that, in some small way, this article will lead to Columbia/Legacy Records, as a part of Sony Music Entertainment, Inc., posting a ‘white paper’ of sorts on their website that at least lists which songs were actually remixed from the first four Byrds’ studio albums and from what source tapes  (http://www.legacyrecordings.com). Byrds’ fans across the globe can only hope, while they enjoy the group’s incredibly timeless, superb, and eclectic music.



Appendix A: Notes on Methodology and the Compilation of Meter Chart Data

Each track on the first four Byrds’ studio albums was diligently listened to, from each relevant source, at matched volume settings on headphones first in order to map out the location of the instruments and vocals across the soundstage. Next, musical cue points and the actual track lengths were noted; listed lengths are notoriously unreliable and were not used. Then each track was listened to multiple times on both headphones and speakers, first from the various sources that represented the original stereo mix, and then from the respective Legacy disc. Any audible differences between them regarding the volume/level of instruments or vocals, their location and depth in the soundstage, as well as their tone, texture, and general frequency characteristics, were noted. All listening session notes were duly dated. In order to gain more insight and perspective into certain tracks, the monaural mixes were listened to as well.  

In order to resolve any questions or uncertainties, or to confirm listening conclusions regarding the status of a particular track-whether or not it had been remixed-comprehensive meter data was compiled from 24-segment, peak reading LED meters from a Sony TC-KA3ES cassette deck. These meters were tested using an Audio Reference CD derived from NCH Digital Waveform Programmable Test Tone software. This Reference CD contained balanced mono signals using standard 16 bit, 44.1 kHz sampling PCM WAV files, with the default output level at 33% of full modulation (Redbook Standard), and presented the following frequencies as sine waves: 33 Hz; 400 Hz; 1 kHz; 13.33 kHz; 15 kHz; and 17.5 kHz.

With the record level (input volume) of the tape deck set at ‘3.0,’ both channels were matched exactly for all the previously listed frequencies, and all registered at –4dB on the meters. The same precise channel matching was observed with the record level set at ‘3.5,’ which naturally resulted in a higher meter reading of 0dB for all frequencies. These two volume settings (‘3.0’ and ‘3.5’) were tested specifically as they represented the most common settings utilized in the testing of individual tracks. As an example, for the CD sources used, the Columbia discs generally were typically set at the higher point (about ‘3.5-4.0’); while the hotter Legacy CD’s usually had to be pegged down to the lower (‘3.0’) level, although there were obviously variations depending on the track. The 1990 box set normally ran between those numbers, although there were occasions where it was dialed in close to the Legacy.

In compiling meter data for specific tracks from relevant sources, the record level setting was adjusted for each source so that the meters registered at the same level for each channel, normally at a specific point in the intro of each song. In this manner, the different mastering levels of each source were compensated for. The resulting output levels of each channel were charted over a range of usually 20-24 specific points throughout a song. Quite often, this meter plotting was repeated several times, for accuracy and consistency purposes.




Appendix B: References


Books and Articles

Cianci, Bob, 2008. Roger McGuinn: Rickenbackers, Martins & Byrds. Premier Guitar. http://www.premierguitar.com/articles/roger-mcguinn-rickenbackers-martins-byrds-1

Ellis, Andy, 2004. Roger McGuinn (Interview). Guitar Player. http://www.guitarplayer.com/story.asp?sectioncode=4&storycode=4362

Fremer, Michael, 2006 (posted 04/01/2007). Sundazed and Mobile Fidelity Make The Case For Mono! (Album Review: The Byrds (reissue) Mr. Tambourine Man; originally posted in Musicangle, 11/01/2006).  http://www.analogplanet.com/content/sundazed-and-mobile-fidelity-make-case-mono-0

Hjort, Christopher. 2008. So You Want To Be a Rock ‘N’ Roll Star. The Byrds Day-By-Day 1965-1973. London: Jawbone Press.

Hoglund, Don. RIAA Equalization Curve For Phonograph Records. http://www.graniteaudio.com/phono/page5.html

Hughes, Rob, 2003. The Byrds. Younger Than Yesterday. Uncut. Take 75.

King, Paul, 2009. The Byrds’ Remastered Albums 1996-2000. http://users.skynet.be/byrdsfollower/remasters1996-2000.htm 

Kubernik, Harvey, 2006. Interview with Roger McGuinn: comfortable in his Folk Den. Goldmine. 32: 15: 678, 19-20.

Moseley, Willie C., 2002. Chris Hillman: Bluegrass, Bass, and Back Again. Vintage Guitar Magazine. www.vintageguitar.com/2935/chris-hillman/


Nork, John, 1997. Roger McGuinn Speaks with John Nork (originally published in the Tracking Angle, 2; posted by Michael Fremer, 10/01/2004). http://www.analogplanet.com/content/roger-mcguinn-speaks-john-norkpart-1-0

_________, The Byrds Reconsidered: The 1996 Legacy CD Reissues-Part 1 (originally published in the Tracking Angle; posted by Michael Fremer, 10/01/20004).

_________, David Crosby Can Remember His Name…and a Great Deal More- Part II (originally published in the Tracking Angle, 2; posted by Michael Fremer, 11/01/2004).  

Priore, Domenic. 2007. Riot On Sunset Strip- Rock ‘n’ roll’s last stand in Hollywood. London: Jawbone Press.

Rogan, Johnny. 2012. Byrds. Requiem For The Timeless. Volume 1. London: R/H [R. House].

____________. 2008. The Byrds. Timeless Flight Revisited. The Sequel. London: Rogan House.

Rowe, Matt, 2013. An Insightful Look at Audio Mastering with Steve Hoffman. The Morton Report. 5/24/2013. http://www.themortonreport.com/entertainment/music/an-insightful-look-into-audio-mastering-with-steve-hoffman/   

Thomson, Graeme, 2012. The Story Of The Notorious Byrd Brothers- Change Is Now. Uncut. 186: 30-35.

_________, Rob Hughes, Tom Pinnock (Interviews by); Introduction by Roger McGuinn. The Byrds’ 20 Greatest  Tracks (As chosen by Emmylou Harris, J Mascis, Bobby Gillespie, Jonathan Wilson and more). Uncut. 186: 36-41.

Unterberger, Richie. 2003. Eight Miles High- Folk-Rock’s Flight from Haight Ashbury to Woodstock. San Francisco: Backbeat Books.

___________. 2002. Turn!Turn!Turn!- The ‘60’s Folk-Rock Revolution. San Francisco: Backbeat Books.


Web Sites


AnalogPlanet web site (Publisher: Keith Pray; Editor: Michael Fremer),

Byrds Flyght web site,

Connors, Tim, 1997-1998. Byrd Watcher- A Field Guide to the Byrds of Los Angeles, web site,

Ford, Roger, 2011. Electric Dylan, web site,

Hoffman, Steve. Mastering Engineer’s web site,

Mix Magazine, Classic Tracks, web site,

Rick Resource Rickenbacker Forum, Byrds Forum: by James Krause, web site,

Sound On Sound Magazine, Classic Tracks, web site,



Acknowledgements


My thanks to Roger Ford, and Christopher Hjort.



Mark Teehan

Monday, April 28, 2014

The Byrds’ First Four Albums Remastered on CD in 1996: A Re-Assessment and Analysis of Remixed Tracks - FOURTH ALBUM: YOUNGER THAN YESTERDAY by MARK TEEHAN



Album: Younger Than Yesterday
·         Original Stereo LP (vinyl): Columbia CS 9442 (Released  2/20/1967)
·         Original Stereo CD: Columbia CK 9442 (1989; hereafter referred to as ‘Columbia’)
·         Original Box Set: The Byrds Boxed Set. 4 CD Boxed Set Columbia/Legacy C4K 46773 (10/19/1990; Cruising Altitude disc).
·         Remixed (partially) and remastered CD: Columbia/Legacy CK 64848
·         Original Mono Mix on CD: Audio Fidelity 24 KT + Gold Compact Disc AFZ 110 (Mastered by Steve Hoffman “From The Original Mono Master Tapes”; 2011; No. 2096).

Number of Remixed Tracks: 4 (out of 11)
Remixed Track Numbers: #2, #6, #7, and #8

Background

By far the best sounding of the Byrds’ first four albums as originally released on CD, the Columbia disc was probably sourced from a 2nd-generation, slightly worn safety copy of the original stereo mix-down master tape, done as a ‘flat transfer’. As a result, there are brief instances of source tape flaws on the Columbia disc, especially audible when listening through headphones. Three tracks- “Renaissance Fair;” “The Girl With No Name;” and “Time Between”- had tape hiss at their endings, whereas the Legacy disc contained no such hiss. The Columbia CD sounded fine when listening through speakers.

The original stereo mix of this superb album generally sounded flat and dry, with the drums lacking resonance and impact, and Hillman’s fine bass guitar work marginalized due to the fact that the bass was severely under-mixed and rolled-off. This deficiency was apparent on both the original stereo LP and the Columbia CD. In this writer’s view, the best way to enjoy this great album is by listening to the superior  monaural mix as presented by Audio Fidelity: there, Steve Hoffman expertly mastered from the original mono master tapes for this CD-as he has done for more than 30 years on many other albums. Original Producer Gary Usher did an excellent job in overseeing that mono mix.

Remixed Tracks

·         Have You Seen Her Face (Track #2)- The obvious tip-off that the Legacy version (2:39, actual timing) was a remix would be the additional length of the song: 16 seconds longer than on the Columbia CD (2:23). Aside from pushing out the fade point about nine seconds (from the 2:15 point to about 2:24), the guitars and bass from the LC were mixed louder on the Legacy, which had greater clarity between the instruments than the Columbia did. The remix of this track included on the 1990 box set was done from the 8-track master, and as in the case of the original stereo mix, was sorely deficient in bass; it ran slightly longer (2:41) than the Legacy remix.

As mentioned previously, the mono mix (album and A-sided single, the third released from the album) of this excellent Chris Hillman-written song was much more effective, with much stronger bass presence than heard on the stereo mixes (original and remixes) and a fuller-bodied guitar sound- McGuinn’s solos on a Gretsch Country Gentleman were extremely powerful. 

·         Everybody’s Been Burned (Track #6)- Aside from running about seven seconds longer (3:03) than the vintage mix (2:56), the Legacy remix of this moving, jazz-influenced song written by David Crosby offered markedly superior delineation between the guitars and boosted the percussive effects and rhythm guitar from the RC. McGuinn’s solo on the break, starting at the 1:29 point, was exquisite and perfectly complemented by Crosby’s fine rhythm guitar licks. As well, Crosby’s lead vocal had more depth, and better tone on the Legacy compared to the Columbia, where it sounded flat and one-dimensional. Another annoying aspect to the original stereo mix was the rushed, almost amateurish fade-out to the track. Furthermore, Hillman’s stylized bass lines from the LC became more audible in the remix.

In this regard, the mono mix presented on the Audio Fidelity CD was downright stunning, as the bass guitar was rightly featured more prominently than even on the Legacy remix, exuding an ominous, brooding quality which enhanced the song’s impact noticeably. Surprisingly, the mono album mix ran a little longer (3:00; 2:58 on the single, the B-side to “So You Want To Be A Rock ‘N’ Roll Star”) than the original stereo mix (2:56).

A rather unexpected aspect to the Legacy remix was the fact that after it peaked at +3db in the LC in spots (00:30; 1:14,), and at +2db in the RC at the latter point prior to the break- generally a full 2-3dB higher then the original mix- it seemed to tail off in volume during and after the break. In effect, the remix apparently was reduced in level from the break onwards perhaps to match the lower output of the original stereo mix. In sharp contrast, the monaural mix was up 1-3dB compared to the Legacy over the same span, with the bass guitar much stronger, using matched input levels. This substantially changed the tenor and impact of the song for the positive.

·         Thoughts And Words (Track #7)- This was an extremely difficult   decision to make, given the fact that Bob Irwin had stated earlier that only three songs from this album had been remixed, and that number had been reached already (counting Track #8, along with Tracks #2 and #6). Nevertheless, my determination that this excellent, multifaceted Chris Hillman track was a remix was based on a preponderance of evidence from three critical sources: actual length, listening comparison tests, and comprehensive meter data. My conclusion here-as with all the remix determinations in this article-was only reached after carefully analyzing all the evidence. If my decision here turns out to have been wrong, then I would stand corrected, as was stated in the introduction.

First of all, the additional three seconds of length on the Legacy (2:55) compared to the original mix (2:52) may not seem important, but they raised a red flag as well as allowing a slightly extended fade-out. Even more significantly, listening comparisons through both headphones and speakers revealed that on the Legacy, the drums and bass from the RC sounded noticeably louder- right out of the gate. Furthermore, the vocals sounded recessed when listening on speakers, and were anchored from the LC, as opposed to the LG as heard on the 1967 mix. The latter had a good balance between channels as well as vocals and instruments, including the backwards guitar parts that began prior (1:24) to the start of the break (1:29) from both channels (1:24-1:51), as well as later from the LC (2:23 onward), including the spot where the vocals ended and the outro started (2:32).

These observations were fully confirmed by meter chart results from 22 selected points throughout the song. Even compensating for the much hotter mastering levels of the Legacy, it proved nearly impossible to achieve any matched channel output levels from the Legacy compared to the Columbia- except for one spot in the LC on the intro! For a good portion of the song until the end section (2:32 onward), even with adjusted input levels, the Legacy’s LC levels were consistently 2dB lower than that of the vintage mix.

On the other hand, completely corroborating my listening results, the RC on the Legacy was generally a good 2-3dB higher in output level compared to the 1967 mix. Whereas the original mix had a nominal differential in channel output levels of 0 to 2dB, the Legacy registered a highly irregular variation of 4 to 6dB (4dB average)- a telltale sign of a remix. On the Legacy, when the break started (1:29), the disparity in output levels between channels was 5dB; when it ended (1:51), the difference was 6dB! In stark contrast, the corresponding figures from the original mix were 2dB and 0dB.

It should be noted that the monaural album mix of this overlooked song sounded superb, and was predictably better than the original mix and the Legacy remix: the bass and drums were mixed stronger, while the vocals and backwards guitar sections sounded solid but in proportion to the rhythm section (its length was 2:52). Why this song was omitted from the 1990 box set, when seven songs from this album were included on it, remains a mystery. As Johnny Rogan rightly pointed out, this tune was “ Arguably Hillman’s finest solo composition….” (2012,322).

·         Mind Gardens (Track #8)- This was a rather obvious remix with a running time of twenty seconds longer (3:46) than the vintage mix (3:26); the fade-out was noticeably extended as a result.


Notes

This album’s challenger was Crosby’s fine period piece, “Renaissance Fair” (Track #4; songwriting credited to Crosby/McGuinn; the B-side to the “My Back Pages” single), which harkened back to a bygone era. Although the Legacy version was not a remix in my opinion, the better quality of the source tape and transfer process brought out enhanced detail from the guitars, as well as highlighting Hillman’s superb bass playing, compared to the Columbia disc. This conclusion was corroborated by meter test results, after making the requisite adjustments for mastering differences.

Saturday, April 12, 2014

The Byrds’ First Four Albums Remastered on CD in 1996: A Re-Assessment and Analysis of Remixed Tracks - THIRD ALBUM: FIFTH DIMENSION by MARK TEEHAN



    Album: Fifth Dimension

  • Original Stereo LP (vinyl): Columbia CS 9349 (Released 07/18/1966)
  • Original Stereo CD: Columbia CK 9349 (1989; hereafter referred to as ‘Columbia’)
  • Remixed (partially) and remastered CD: Columbia/Legacy CK 64847 (04/1996; hereafter referred to as ‘Legacy.’)
  • “Original Album Mono Version” with “Mono Bonus Tracks” (3) and “Original Album Stereo Version.” Sony Music Japan International Inc. SICP 20374. (Blu-Spec CD. Made In Japan. 2012)

Number of remixed tracks on the Legacy CD, CK 64847: 5 (out of 11 tracks)
Remixed Track Numbers: #4, #5, #7, #8, and #9

Background
By far the worst sounding of the original 1987 Columbia CDs, this transitional album was probably sourced from a 4th or 5th-generation safety copy of the master tape; the first six songs (‘Side A’) suffered in sound quality-especially the first four. In any event, the source tape must have been in poor condition, at least ‘Reel A;’ that portion of the album had a gritty, metallic edge to its sound. Fortunately, ‘Reel B’ was in much better shape, so the songs from ‘Side B’ of the LP sounded relatively better on the Columbia- at least passable. Nevertheless, for the songs from ‘Side A,’ the resulting distortion on primarily vocals but also guitar parts did more than anything to unfairly give the entire lot of original Columbia CDs a bad reputation. Most recently, Bob Irwin has stated that only “a third” of this album was remixed for the Legacy CD “… because of oxide loss problems…. ” (King, 2009, 4). This would equate to four songs being remixed, one song less than my detailed listening comparisons revealed.

Remixed Songs

·         I See You  (Track #4)- A telltale giveaway was the Legacy’s running time (2:38) being five seconds longer than the Columbia’s (2:33).  Whereas the guitars (LC) and vocals (centered) were severely distorted on the Columbia, to the point of making this song virtually un-listenable (notably on headphones), on the Legacy remix none of these problems were evident. By using the three- track reduction master, Vic Anesini was able to create a much clearer remix, without the annoying distortion present on the Columbia. McGuinn’s Coltrane-inspired 12-string guitar lines were especially effective, while the bell-like sounds near the song’s end were more audible. In an interesting side-note, this song was remixed from the eight-track multi-track master on the 1990 box set, with the drums and clavia in the right channel mixed louder than on the 1996 Legacy remix.

·         What’s Happening?!?!  (Track #5)- David Crosby’s first solo writing credit with the group featured innovative guitar interplay with Roger McGuinn, and sported a psychedelic, raga feel. On the Legacy remix, which ran four seconds longer (2:34) than the original stereo mix on the vinyl LP and Columbia CD (2:30), as well the mono mix (album and B-side single), there was a final guitar note that was missing from the latter original mixes (stereo and mono). The Legacy remix also provided better articulation and balance between the guitars, and brought the drums up in the mix: they were almost buried on the 1966 mix.

·         Eight Miles High (Track #7)- Arguably the Byrd’s best song and finest recorded moment as a true collaborative effort, the original stereo mix showcased its musical strengths quite effectively: Hillman’s deep, ominous, menacing bass intro from the LC, followed by Clarke’s powerful drumming (RC)-arguably one of his finest moments; McGuinn’s inspired guitar playing and incredible solos; Crosby’s excellent staccato rhythm guitar work (LC); and finally, the group’s ghastly vocals cast in the middle of the mix. In the 1966 mix, the song had a dynamic ebb and flow, with a remarkable instrumental balance that maintained the rhythm section at a strong level while the Rickenbacker flashed at breathtaking intensity throughout. The words seamless and exceptional come to mind in trying to describe the original stereo mix of this ahead-of-its-time song, equally well represented by the vinyl LP and the 1990 box set (not remixed), with the former having a slight edge. Even on the Columbia CD, it sounded decent-especially on speakers- at about 85% of the box set’s sound quality.

After exhaustive listening sessions and meticulous notes compiled from metering observations taken over an extended period of time, it became this writer’s contention that the Legacy version was a remix. This became quite apparent on the intro, when the bass guitar opened at a markedly lower output level (-4dB down in the LC), and significantly, without the deep, resonating overtones that typified the original mix. As well, the drums entered the RC at a 2-4dB lower level than the box set, as always, using matched record level (input) settings. Despite this lower start in volume, the Legacy caught up, to the point where, at the start of the second verse, it ran +2dB higher in the LC than the original mix. Further proof that the version on the Legacy was a remix: its 2dB output differential between channels at that spot, compared to the box set’s nominal zero (0dB) variation. 

Significantly, the Rickenbacker was mixed louder on the Legacy, from the opening riffs and continuing throughout the song; ditto for the rhythm guitar in the LC: it too sounded louder on the Legacy. In addition, the vocals were more prominent and rode higher in the remix, and were shifted over to the LG, instead of being positioned  towards the center area (LG-center) as on the 1966 mix. This situation was quite different than the original mix, where the vocals were trapped in the middle, almost buried, giving them that eerie, zombie-like feel.

None of the preceding was meant to diminish the sonic excellence of the remix, including its increased instrumental detail-notably on the guitars. It is certainly understandable how, based on a cursory, non-comparative listening experience, one could conclude that the Legacy version was not a remix- especially if the listener was unfamiliar with the original stereo mix.  Nevertheless, the Legacy version came across as a cleaner, more ‘clinical,’ ultimately different version of the 1966 mix. In the final analysis, a detailed examination of both the aural and metering level evidence supports my conclusion that this track was remixed for the Legacy CD. In some respects, it sounded as if it might have been remixed from the 8-track masters, as opposed to the three-track reduction master, although this is speculation on my part.  While hardly a conclusive sign of proof, it was interesting that Bob Irwin informed writer John Nork that one of the gems unearthed in the exhaustive search through the Columbia tape vaults was the multi-track master tape of “Eight Miles High.” (

It was interesting to observe that some of the sonic differences and remixing decisions found with the Legacy stereo remix seem to have been patterned after the original mono mix of this song,               which ran two seconds longer (3:35 listed; 3:33 actual length) and thus included a barely audible final drum roll absent from the stereo mixes (3:33 listed; 3:31 actual length). Undeniably, the mono mix (single and album) had a driving, relentless intensity that was quite effective: the Rickenbacker was understandably dominant during McGuinn’s three incredible overdubbed solos (starting at 00:11; 1:43; and 2:57), while Crosby’s stabbing rhythm guitar fills were mixed higher prior to the Rickenbacker solos.

However, the 12-string lead receded during the rest of the song, while the vocals were louder, being mixed more out front. The rhythm section was generally well presented on the mono mix, although it inevitably lacked the detail and separation of the 1966 stereo mix, and was normally in the background; the drums provided decent accent at critical points. It bears mentioning that the mono single mix displayed a tad more ‘pop’, with evidence of compression (1-2dB) than the mono album version. As presented on the Blu-Spec disc, the latter exhibited a surprising 2dB channel differential in places- uncharacteristic of a monaural mix, and unlike the single ‘45’ mix’s virtual 0dB channel deviation.

On the other hand, the original stereo mix maintained the Rickenbacker at a solid level throughout the song, aside from the solos, while the vocals were pulled back, giving them that trapped, eerie feel. As well, the interplay between guitars was better presented, while the bass guitar and drums had a much more audible, consistent presence throughout the entire song. Overall, the 1966 stereo mix sounded more like a band playing live in the studio, and had more ambience, as well as a mesmerizing dynamism, than the mono mix. It is this writer’s contention that the incredible musical complexity of this groundbreaking song was more fully rendered on the 1966 stereo mix. 

·         Hey Joe (Where You Gonna Go)  (Track #8)- Here the Legacy remix (2:16) checked in at four seconds longer than the Columbia (2:12), allowing it to feature a longer fade out; the drums out of the right channel rode higher in the remix, with more ‘pop’ than on the vintage mix. David Crosby’s relentless one-year campaign to get the Byrds to include this Los Angeles favorite originating from their Ciro’s shows, written by Billy Roberts and popularized nationally as a Top 40 single by the Leaves, had finally paid off. The Leaves were one of many LA bands who played the song in live gigs from 1965-1966; their single peaked at #2 on the survey of top Los Angeles station KRLA, on 5/7/1966. It was probably no coincidence that the Byrds had made their first attempt at recording this song about 1-4 days prior to that date, and completed it ten days after it, on 17 May 1966 (Rogan 2012, 1020-1021; Hjort 2008, 94, for the completion date).


·         Captain Soul  (Track #9)- An easy giveaway with the Legacy remix (2:53) timing out twenty seconds longer than the original Columbia mix (2:33); the top end was cleaner on the remix. This soul/R&B-influenced instrumental was primarily the idea of drummer Michael Clarke, who only received part (25%) of the songwriting credit and played harmonica on the break, and served as the B-side to the “5D (Fifth Dimension)” single (Rogan 2012, 297).

Notes

By far the most challenging track to decipher was “5D (Fifth Dimension),” the album’s lead off cut and a 45 single that was written by McGuinn as an adventurous foray into metaphysics. Unfortunately, it was misinterpreted by the pop music press in 1966 as a ‘drug song’ and suffered commercially as a result (#39 peak on Cash Box; #44 on Billboard, both 7/30/1966; Hjort 2008, 97; 102). While predictably mastered much hotter on the Legacy- generally +4db louder in the LC compared to the Columbia disc- it was determined to be the same as the original mix. Undoubtedly using a superior source tape, the adjusted channel output levels of the Legacy version closely matched those of the 1966 mix, notably from the vinyl LP; the right channel output of the Legacy was spot on, while the left channel sported several slight 1-2dB increases.

The Legacy version conformed to the critical musical cues of the original mix: 1:14, the vocal bridge with the extended “Oh” leading off the fourth and final verse; 1:55, Van Dyke Park’s haunting organ from the RC; 2:15-2:16, the beginning of the fade out; and 2:32, the song’s ending. These observations were confirmed by careful listening comparisons. This was a case where both the superiority of the source tape and the analog-to-digital transfer used for the Legacy CD made the track sound markedly different from the Columbia, suggesting the possibility of a remix. Once again, the vinyl LP proved to be a valuable source, and helped tremendously in making a determination. If this track was a remix on the Legacy, then it was one of the best-executed remixes ever made, and this writer would duly stand corrected. Incidentally, this song was remixed for the box set from the 8-track masters.

Monday, March 24, 2014

The Byrds’ First Four Albums Remastered on CD in 1996: A Re-Assessment and Analysis of Remixed Tracks - SECOND ALBUM: TURN TURN TURN by MARK TEEHAN



Album: Turn! Turn! Turn!
·         Original Stereo LP (vinyl): Columbia CS 9254 (Released 12/6/1965)
·         Original Stereo CD: Columbia CK 9254 (1987; hereafter referred to as ‘Columbia’)
·         Remixed (partially) and Remastered CD: Columbia/Legacy CK 64846 (4/30/1996; hereafter referred to as ‘Legacy.’)
·         “Original Album Mono Version” with “Mono Bonus Tracks” (4) and “Original Album Stereo Version” with “Stereo Bonus Track.” Sony Music Japan International Inc. SICP 20373 (Blu-Spec CD. Made In Japan. 2012)


Number of Remixed Tracks on the Legacy CD, CK 64846: 6 (out of 11 total; 9 actual total-see below)
Remixed Track Numbers: #2, #3, #4, #6, #8, and #9.

Background

As the title track (Track #1) used a monaural mix, and “He Was A      Friend Of Mine” (Track #5) utilized a very narrow stereo (virtual mono) mix on the original stereo album, these two songs will be discussed separately, under the “Notes” section.

After careful listening comparisons between the vinyl LP and the Columbia CD, it was determined that the latter was sourced from a rather worn safety copy of the master tape- most likely a 3rd/4th-generation copy. In this writer’s opinion, the Turn! Turn! Turn!    album was deliberately mixed for stereo with less lower bass output than its predecessor, with the electric 12-string lead and rhythm guitars and vocals emphasized, giving it a pronounced trebly, mid-range sound. Thus, a 2nd-generation cutting master probably was never made- it would have been unnecessary. As a result, the monaural mix of this album- with the drums riding higher and with stronger bass output- offered a relatively more focused, energetic sonic presentation. In addition, the mono mixes from this album were quite consistent and well executed, unlike those from the first album, which had noticeable variability and uneven, questionable results. Nevertheless, the original 1965 stereo mix of this album offered revealing delineation between the guitars.


Whereas the Mr. Tambourine Man album had a fair amount of unpredictability with the original stereo mix, in terms of where instruments were located across the soundstage, this album had less variety with the 1965 stereo mix. On eight songs, the Rickenbacker was paired up with the drums in the RC, while Crosby’s Gretsch and Hillman’s bass guitar were mixed hard left (LC). It was almost as if this album’s stereo mixing engineer had a deliberate, convenient approach, and stuck to it.


Remixed Tracks

·         It Won’t Be Wrong (Track #2)- The original stereo mix of this excellent, well-recorded up-tempo tune, written earlier by McGuinn and his friend Harvey Gerst, featured an arresting dual guitar intro (Rickenbacker, RC; Gretsch, LC), with a prominent 12-string lead line (00:05) that exuded a distinctive, almost piercing siren-like tone. Then the bass guitar (LC) and drums (RC) entered (00:06), followed by the superb vocals (00:10). On the other hand, the Legacy remix was more restrained with less edge on the Rick. It sounded as if the EQ on the Rickenbacker was different and lower on the Legacy; even the mono mix had the timbre of the Rick pitched higher, similar to the original stereo mix.

Another notable difference with the Legacy occurred with the vocals: they seemed recessed on it, while on the classic mix, they were more open and seemed to ride on top of the instruments. There was a unique ambience to the vintage mix that was missing from the Legacy. Otherwise, the band track, led by the drums (RC), sounded stronger on the remix; the upper range percussive parts displayed better definition. (This song, originally titled ”Don’t Be Long,” had been recorded in 1964 under the Beefeaters pseudonym and released as the B-side to an Elektra single. Rogan 2012,44;225).

A careful analysis of the track’s meter chart data confirmed the above comments regarding the restrained sound of the 12-string lead on the Legacy during the tune’s opening: at the 00:09 mark, right before the vocals dropped in, the RC of the Legacy was 2db down compared to the original stereo mix. As well, the LC also ran –2dB lower. It was noteworthy that the output levels on the remix caught up quickly, registering peaks of +1dB greater in both channels by the end of the first line of lyrics, versus the 1965 mix. It should be mentioned that the meter data revealed that the Legacy was a very clever remix, quite faithful to the original mix, as its output levels were generally within 1dB of the original mix. Interestingly, the mono album mix’s opening (00:09) had levels that matched (LC) or were within –1dB (RC) of the 1965 stereo mix.

           Fortunately, the Legacy remix was clearly superior to that done
for the 1990 box set. Despite the latter also being remixed from the 3-track reduction master tape, it sounded even more muffled, with the guitars masked, while the Rickenbacker lacked sparkle and the drums had no bite. It was interesting to note that the 45 single mix-produced by the group, not Terry Melcher, who had been sacked-featured Clarke’s drums much more prominently, even more so than the mono album mix. Initially relegated to the B-side of the Byrds’ fourth single release before being flipped, this more commercially appealing tune should have been the A-side from the start, and would have had a reasonable chance of reaching the Top Twenty of the U.S. charts, despite the musical acclaim of the following song, which initially was the A-side.
                          
·         Set You Free This Time (Track #3)- The Gene Clark Echoes CD, along with the vinyl LP, proved invaluable as benchmarks for comparison purposes for this outstanding track, which inexplicably was left off the 1990 Box set. The Echoes disc was clearly sourced from a better quality tape than the Columbia CD. From the start, it became apparent that the Legacy version was a remix: the opening 25 seconds sounded lower in level, almost muted, as borne out by the lower meter output levels (-2dB down compared to the vintage mix, using matched input levels on the intro). After that point, Clark’s heartfelt lead vocal   ramped up louder for each verse on the Legacy, albeit with less depth and a thinner tone, while the hi-hat was brighter and had better definition. The bass guitar from the LC also sounded louder on the remix, especially as each verse crested.

Undoubtedly, the Legacy offered better articulation on both guitars- the Gretsch in the LC, the 12-string from the RC. While tastefully implemented and faithful to the original mix, the Legacy was still a remix. The most noticeable difference was on Clark’s vocal, which sounded fuller, with a thicker texture on the 1965 mix.

·         Lay Down Your Weary Tune (Track #4)- On this underrated Dylan cover, the original mix was well-balanced across the soundstage, with the vocals centered, the bass and rhythm guitars anchoring the LC while the 12-string and drums fired   out of the RC. McGuinn’s Rickenbacker and Crosby’s Gretsch had a chime-like sound, with good presence. Although the harmony vocals on the Columbia CD were distorted, sounding fatigued at least for the first 27 seconds of the song- especially when listening on headphones- they sounded fine on the vinyl LP.

In contrast, the vocals were boosted on the Legacy remix, while the bass and rhythm guitars from the LC were louder, although presented in superior detail. As well, the harmony vocals were clear throughout the remix, in marked difference from the Columbia CD. Further indication that the Legacy version was a remix has been furnished by closely analyzed meter data from the matched peak output levels, for both channels, between the Columbia and Legacy CD’s. While the former had a consistent 0-2dB differential between channels, the latter registered a wider range of 2-4dB, with the LC dominant in output level.
   
         This song was originally remixed also from the 3-track reduction
         master for the 1990 box set, in a manner similar to that of the
         Legacy remix.


·         The World Turns All Around Her (Track #6)- On this superb up-tempo tune written by Gene Clark, the original stereo mix had a nifty dual guitar intro and outro, with Crosby’s rhythm guitar located in the LC and McGuinn’s 12-string firing out of the RC. Both guitars had excellent presence and tone, and were joined, respectively, by Hillman’s bass (LC) and Clarke’s drums (RC). The song had a rising intensity, with nice dynamics, and was one of the album’s highlights; the harmony vocals were highly effective.

However, as in the case of “It Won’t Be Wrong,” it became obvious right from the song’s start that the Legacy was a remix: the vocals were lower in the mix, almost muffled, the EQ/timbre on the guitars was down, with noticeably less sparkle on the 12-string, while the bass (LC) and drums were boosted compared to the original mix. Once again, these observations were confirmed by calibrated meter test results, with matched input levels on the intro. Whereas on the original mix the RC ran 2dB higher than the LC about 40% of the time, on the remix there was not any similar consistency. Instead, the Legacy had the LC higher about 50% throughout the song- at one point 2dB hotter.

In addition, shortly after the rhythm section and vocals entered (00:07), the remix was up 2dB higher than the 1965 mix. Similar telltale indications that the Legacy was a remix occurred during the following sections of the song: the second verse (the LC of the Legacy ran 2-4dB louder than the original mix); the break (again, the LC of the remix registered peaks 2-3dB higher); and the third verse (the Legacy sported crests 3-4dB hotter in the LC   than the 1965 mix).
   
Incidentally, the box set 8-track remix of this superb song   included bongos that had been removed from the 1965 mix. Once again like the Legacy, the former had a subdued intro and whose vocals sounded shelved. Despite some superficial similarities, the Legacy remix had a more robust rhythm section and was plainly superior. The alternate ‘bongo’ mix was included on the Legacy disc as a bonus track (#17).


·         If You’re Gone (Track #8)- By far the most challenging track from this album to determine whether or not it had been remixed was this melancholic, overlooked ballad written by Gene Clark. Initially, I had pegged it as not being a remix, although there clearly was something different between the sound of the Legacy and the 1965 mix- it was quite demanding to identify. After numerous listening sessions through both headphones and speakers, and multiple meter plots that covered 28 carefully chosen musical cue points, this writer finally was finally able to conclude that the Legacy was in fact a remix- an extremely clever one!

Undoubtedly, the most notable difference with the Legacy remix occurred with Clark’s impassioned lead vocal: it was boosted, rode higher, and had more air and depth on the remix. Conversely, on the original mix it was relatively restrained, somewhat thinner and balanced with the instrumental tracks. The other variation that became more noticeable after repeated listening was that the drums from the right channel were mixed louder and sounded more forward on the Legacy, whereas on the 1965 mix they seemed recessed. One might assume that Vic Anesini had used the mono mix as a guide regarding the drums. In addition, the rhythm guitar (LC) sounded lower in level during the two instrumental breaks. The original mix was noteworthy for the guitar interplay, led by the sustained, bugler-like tone of the Rickenbacker from the RC, as well as the floating haze of harmony vocals (LC) that reinforced the song’s sad spirit.

These observations were fully supported by extensive meter charting from three separate sessions, as always with matched input levels for the song’s opening. It was interesting to note that for the first part of the track, up to 00:40, there was good correlation on the levels of both channels between the original mix and the remix (matched or within 1dB). However, as Clark sang “now” at the end of the fifth line of lyrics (“If I stand alone understanding now”, at the 00:41 point), the Legacy began to register channel differential readings of 3-4dB quite often for the remainder of the tune (ten out of nineteen cue points), with the RC dominant. In contrast, the original mix sported level variations between channels of 0 to 2dB, with one 3dB difference at the 2:25 spot. Alternately, on the first instrumental break, starting at 1:12, the LC on the Legacy started out 3-4dB lower compared to the LC of the 1965 mix; this anomaly was virtually replicated on the second break, starting at 2:06 (2-3dB lower).

It is worth mentioning that while Vic Anesini’s remix of this track for the 1991 Gene Clark Echoes disc was different from the Legacy remix- the former sounded as if it had been remixed from the 8-tracks- nonetheless there were similarities between the two. The Echoes remix also registered sizeable channel differentials of 2-5dB from the 00:41 point onward, especially at the start of both instrumental sections, when the LC was decreased by -4dB both times, compared to the original mix. The 1991 remix, while reasonably solid, had the droning harmony vocals sounding off (flat?) early in the song, at the 00:06-00:07 point.




·         The Times They Are A-Changin’ (Track #9)- While the output of the intro on the Legacy version was matched to the original mix of this Dylan cover, nevertheless there were detectable differences. On the Legacy, the centered vocals- with McGuinn singing lead- were markedly louder, along with the bass guitar in the LC. In addition, Crosby’s rhythm guitar fills in the center were more audible, while McGuinn’s Rick in the RC was consistently 2dB lower compared to the LC output on the Legacy remix. This disparity stood in marked contrast to the original stereo mix, where the channel output differential was 0dB for most of the song. Furthermore, the 1965 mix had reverb on the Rick during the intro while the remix did not. Even so, overall the Legacy remix sounded quite close to the original: the differences were well masked and only apparent upon close listening.

           On the 1990 box set, this track was remixed from the 8-track
master and paled in comparison to the Legacy remix: the electric 12-string lacked sparkle and was at a lower level, McGuinn’s opening vocal was noticeably down in volume, while the drums were mixed too loud. This remix frankly came across as artificial and unsuccessful.

If the Byrds sounded as if they were going through the motions on this track, which had a languid, flat feel, they could be partially excused, as this was the fourth time they had been in the studio recording it! In fact, this was the second time around for version III, which appeared on the album (10/27/65-10/28/65; Rogan 2012, 1018-1019). It is worth pointing out that the group had actually recorded version I of the song back on 28 June 1965, as it was given serious consideration for being their next single throughout that summer, and Columbia Records had gone as far as printing “thousands of sleeves” for it (ibid, 201; 178 ff; 1018). While this song was never released as a single- the band was dissatisfied with their various attempts- version I sported a more energetic arrangement and a rather derisive lead vocal from McGuinn compared to the eventual album version. With a running time of barely 1:52, version I was seemingly over before it started, and can be heard on the Blu-Spec disc (best overall sound; bonus track, #14), the Sundazed LP set, and as a bonus track on the Legacy (track #14; slightly slowed down in tempo).



   

Notes

The following tracks did not appear as true stereo mixes on the original Columbia stereo LP. While the title track was definitely monaural, there is some question about the second, which was probably in very narrow stereo (twin-track?). In any event, they will be discussed in detail here.

·         Turn! Turn! Turn! (To Everything There Is A Season) (Track #1)- It was noteworthy that while the mono single mix of the Byrds’ second Number One hit had a length of 3:34 and was slightly speeded up, it was extended 8 seconds to 3:42 on the original stereo album-as a mono mix-with a slightly slower tempo. As a result of the inferior quality of its source tape, the Columbia CD version had audible tape hiss in three spots (00:51-00:52; 1:29; and 3:21), along with a slight wavering in the sound at 2:37-2:38. The most significant difference in sound between the stereo vinyl LP and the Columbia CD occurred   with the instrumental backing track: on the former, it had more impact, especially on the break; the latter sounded fatigued and worn in comparison.

On the Legacy CD, this track had an extended fade, which added seven seconds to its running time (3:49). The sound on the Legacy was uniformly excellent, with no tape hiss or flaws; as in the case of the single mix, it was sped up a bit. Instrumentally, this version had real energy, with the guitars having more presence, while the vocals emerged with enhanced clarity, compared to the Columbia CD.

For many years it had been assumed that this song had never been mixed in true stereo, and that the original multi-track studio tapes had been lost. While the latter is probably still true,    Johnny Rogan made the startling discovery that a true stereo mix “… existed in Dickson’s archives….” (Rogan 2012, 1038-1039; Jim Dickson was the Byrds’ first manager). Nevertheless, at the time the 1990 box set was being prepared, this vital information was unknown. Thus, Tim Geelan and Vic Anesini decided to offer a narrow ‘stereo’ remix for that set. Using the “original two-track tape”, they panned the vocals slightly to the left, with the instrumental backing track- and McGuinn’s Rickenbacker overdubs- to the right (box set liner notes, 3). They also gave the latter an extended fade, so their ‘remix’ ran 3:52 (actual time). The recent 2012 Blu-Spec CD of the Turn! Turn! Turn! album includes this narrow stereo remix as a bonus track (#27), while also including the mono album version of the song (track #1; 3:34) and the original stereo album version (track #16; 3:42) discussed earlier.


·         He Was A Friend Of Mine (Track #5)- Whether this traditional folk song updated by McGuinn was a dedicated mono mix or an extremely narrow stereo (twin-track?) mix on the original 1965 stereo LP has been a challenging puzzle. The aural evidence, in this listener’s opinion, points to the latter. In any event, it was a rather strange creation, with the acoustic guitar opening up just to the left of the center, while the vocals (00:09) were virtually centered; the bass guitar, organ, and tambourine joined the acoustic guitar to the left of the center (Producer Terry Melcher had added the last two instruments without the band’s knowledge or approval, much to David Crosby’s consternation; Rogan 2012, 228). Listening to this version through headphones, one finds the soundstage collapsed, with extremely limited stereo separation. On the Columbia CD, the vocals sounded somewhat coarse, while the bass guitar was distorted for much of the song.


Another indication that this version was not a monaural mix: the output levels of each channel were only matched about 50% of the time. At about the 1:00 minute point in the song, the RC increased +2db over the LC, as McGuinn sang, “He was in Dallas town.” In fact, much of the RC is plainly driven by the vocals. A true mono mix would not have had 1-2 dB variations between channels for a good portion of the song.


For the 1990 box set, this song was handled in a similar fashion as the title track. Using the “original two-track tape,” Geelan and Anesini created a ‘stereo’ mix by panning the instruments, led by the acoustic guitar, to the right, while the vocals were panned to the left- a wider reversal of what was presented on the original stereo LP. Curiously, the final fourth verse (“Leader of a nation, for such a precious time; He was a friend of mine”) was omitted, leaving the track with a shorter running time of 2:09.

In contrast, the version presented on the Sundazed LP set is indeed a dedicated mono mix that definitely sounded different than the one found on the original stereo album. Starting with the opening acoustic guitar, everything- including the vocals- was centered, at the same spot. Most telling, both channels were dead even in level for the entire song. Although there is some distortion on the bass guitar, it is less than that heard on the preceding version.

The version featured on the Legacy CD was also a dedicated mono mix, very similar to the one from the Sundazed LP set, with everything dead centered. However, the bass guitar sounded more distorted on the Legacy CD, and the channels were not as perfectly matched as heard on that fine vinyl set. Otherwise, the Legacy offered better overall clarity and detail. Surprisingly, both the Legacy’s liner notes and inside back cover erroneously list this song as being in stereo, when it clearly is not- an apparent oversight.

In the judgment of this listener, the very good quality sound of this song displayed on the Legacy CD was surpassed slightly by the import Blu-Spec CD, in its “Mono Album Version” (track #5). The clarity and dynamics were superb, there was less distortion on the bass guitar, and both channels were perfectly matched throughout. Perhaps a better source tape and transfer were used for the Blu-Spec disc. 

After “If You’re Gone,” the most difficult track to decipher from this album was “Wait And See,” the first Byrds’ song where McGuinn/Crosby received the songwriting credit (Track #10). While it initially had been classified as a remix, a more recent thorough listening review and detailed meter charting convinced me otherwise, that it was not a remix. The presence and tone of the guitars on the Legacy matched that of the original 1965 stereo mix, while the vocals had the same level and balance. The actual lengths (2:17), the cue spots on the break (1:33-1:45), and the location of the vibrant 12-string solo on the bridge matched exactly between the two sources.

Furthermore, the meter data results were generally consistent (matched, or within 1dB) between the Columbia and Legacy discs; the only brief discrepancy of note occurred during the break, when the LC of the Legacy ran 2dB lower than the Columbia. In the end, my determination was based on repeated listening comparisons on both headphones and speakers between these discs as well as the vinyl LP. The Legacy offered better articulation on the guitars, while the vocals had a bit more clarity- improvements due no doubt to the use of a better source tape compared to the Columbia. If this track really was a remix on the Legacy, then it would have to have been one the most realistic remixes ever made, and of course this writer would stand corrected.


Finally, for clarification, it should be noted that the vinyl LP is the best way to hear this album in stereo as it was originally mixed. Nevertheless, despite the flaws discussed earlier- quite apparent when listening through headphones- the Columbia CD sounds reasonably decent on full-range speakers.